Accountant's sacking not due to exercise of workplace rights, says court

An accounting firm dismissed a client manager because of serious misconduct rather than the "several and various exercises of his workplace rights" in the lead-up to his dismissal, the Federal Circuit Court has found.

Chan & Naylor (Parramatta) Pty Ltd terminated the employment of the client manager after more than six years' service when it became aware – while the manager was on leave due to illness and an injury allegedly suffered at work – that his actions had exposed some clients to additional tax liabilities and potential fines and penalties.

The firm also became aware that he had been conducting private business during working hours and using company resources.

After the manager refused to meet with his managers to discuss the issues and then provided an inadequate response by email, the firm dismissed him.

The client manager, however, alleged that he was sacked because of bullying, harassment and discrimination allegations he had made over several years and more recent complaints to the Fair Work Ombudsman about unpaid wages and leave entitlements and to WorkCover about a back injury.

He also argued that the accounting firm took adverse action when it dismissed him while on leave.

Judge Robert Cameron, however, found that the client's serious misconduct was both sufficiently serious to justify dismissal and the sole basis for the company's action.

He said he accepted that the "several and various exercises of his workplace rights did not motivate Chan & Naylor Parramatta" to dismiss the manager.

Judge Cameron said that evidence also supported a finding that the company was "concerned with the way he performed his work, not whether he was absent because of illness".

He also rejected allegations by the client manager that he had been treated differently to other staff who had not been disciplined for mistakes or misconduct, saying that he did not believe that any other employee had engaged in conduct of the "same serious quality".

Mendonca v Chan & Naylor (Parramatta) Pty Ltd & Anor [2014] FCCA 1042 (2 June 2014))

Did you miss...

New power for FWC to act urgently on fuel prices

The Albanese Government will amend the Fair Work Act to fast-track applications by unions and transport operators to win "emergency" supply chain orders from the FWC to raise rates to keep pace with surging fuel prices, driven by the Middle East war. more

Super "onboarding" legislation passes parliament

The Albanese Government has today won passage through Parliament of legislation that streamlines choice of super funds when employers are "onboarding" new employees and seeks to prevent advertising of super products during that process. more

Courts and FWC differ over sleepover payments

A full Federal Court has confirmed that homecare, disability and social workers should not be paid penalty rates for shifts immediately before or after sleepovers, four months after the FWC made draft award variations that will achieve the opposite. more

Court orders Woolies to pay big fine to meat union

A court has fined Woolworths $233,250 for denying three part-time employees standard rosters, guaranteed hours and overtime pay, citing a lack of evidence "at the corporate mind level" and awarding the full sum to the AMIEU to encourage its enforcement work. more