Accountant's sacking not due to exercise of workplace rights, says court

An accounting firm dismissed a client manager because of serious misconduct rather than the "several and various exercises of his workplace rights" in the lead-up to his dismissal, the Federal Circuit Court has found.

Chan & Naylor (Parramatta) Pty Ltd terminated the employment of the client manager after more than six years' service when it became aware – while the manager was on leave due to illness and an injury allegedly suffered at work – that his actions had exposed some clients to additional tax liabilities and potential fines and penalties.

The firm also became aware that he had been conducting private business during working hours and using company resources.

After the manager refused to meet with his managers to discuss the issues and then provided an inadequate response by email, the firm dismissed him.

The client manager, however, alleged that he was sacked because of bullying, harassment and discrimination allegations he had made over several years and more recent complaints to the Fair Work Ombudsman about unpaid wages and leave entitlements and to WorkCover about a back injury.

He also argued that the accounting firm took adverse action when it dismissed him while on leave.

Judge Robert Cameron, however, found that the client's serious misconduct was both sufficiently serious to justify dismissal and the sole basis for the company's action.

He said he accepted that the "several and various exercises of his workplace rights did not motivate Chan & Naylor Parramatta" to dismiss the manager.

Judge Cameron said that evidence also supported a finding that the company was "concerned with the way he performed his work, not whether he was absent because of illness".

He also rejected allegations by the client manager that he had been treated differently to other staff who had not been disciplined for mistakes or misconduct, saying that he did not believe that any other employee had engaged in conduct of the "same serious quality".

Mendonca v Chan & Naylor (Parramatta) Pty Ltd & Anor [2014] FCCA 1042 (2 June 2014))

Did you miss...

Report questions productivity-wage link

The Albanese Government should force companies to share productivity gains with employees via higher pay rises, extra leave or shorter hours, according to research using the retail sector to challenge "conventional wisdom" that productivity growth flows through to workers. more

Newsflash: Qantas to pay $90 million penalty

The Federal Court has today ordered Qantas to pay a $90 million fine - including $50 million to the TWU - for the Flying Kangaroo's unlawful outsourcing of the jobs of about 1800 ground handling employees, while it has criticised chief executive Vanessa Hudson for failing to appear to explain the airline's contrition. more

Watchdog's conduct wanting in Autism-bias case

A worker has failed to convince the FWC that Victoria's corruption watchdog dismissed her because of her "combative communication style" and her "unnecessary assessment of colleagues' work", which she argued amounted to manifestations of her Autism, rather than because of her misconduct. more

Ahead of roundtable, review says IR part of the debate

The Secure Jobs review panel has used its final report to challenge employer claims that the changes will harm productivity, while also underscoring the importance of gender equality and the distribution of gains to workers as further drivers. more

Change penalties laws to avert rorting: Stewart

Eminent employment law academic Andrew Stewart has urged the Albanese Government to amend its penalty rates protection legislation to shut down potential avenues to circumvent it. more