Who pays redundancy?

Two labour hire companies that lost their contracts at a Tooheys site after 20 years have failed to convince Fair Work Australia that the brewery should pay the workers' redundancy.

FP Group Pty Ltd and Proden Pty Ltd sought relief under s120(2) of the Fair Work Act from making redundancy payments or, as a fallback, asked that the payments be reduced for those who'd found suitable alternative employment.

The companies had held contracts at the brewery, in the western Sydney suburb of Lidcombe, from 1991 until Tooheys ended them last year and took on the Skilled Group. Skilled will offer work to some of the FP Group and Proden employees.

Nine of the workers who lost their jobs have also filed unfair dismissal claims - naming the labour hire companies as the respondent employers - but those cases have been put on hold until the tribunal's determination of the jurisdictional issue.

FP Group and Proden argued before Deputy President Peter Sams that Tooheys was the workers' true employer, and that their arrangements with the brewery were a "sham". They only acted as agents and provided limited services, such as recruitment and payroll, they said.

But Deputy President Sams, in rejecting their bid, said that a s120 application wasn't the mechanism for determining the true employer of the workers.

He said the labour hire companies' application was "fundamentally misconceived and must be dismissed".

Deputy President Sams agreed with Tooheys that a s120 bid could only be made by the employer of the affected employees.

The labour hire companies' case, he said, suffered from an "incurable contradiction", in that they couldn't assert they were not the "true employers" while at the same time bringing a s120 application as the employers of the affected employees. "This is impermissible, not only as a matter of law, but of simple logic," he said.

He continued that even if his conclusion was wrong and the tribunal accepted that the labour hire companies weren't the employers, they couldn't, as a matter of law, confer obligations on a third party under s120.

FP Group Pty Ltd v Tooheys Pty Ltd [2012] FWA 2133 (20 March 2012)

Did you miss...

Gender pay gap steady; and more

Gender pay gap steady, says ABS; One quarter of workers still experiencing harassment, says DCA; Conference to canvass workplace AI risks; and Labour law conference seeking papers. more

LSL ruling applies to just a single worker

The Federal Court has found that the limits to the FWC's dispute resolution powers mean that its ruling about an agreement's new long service leave clause only applies to the worker that first raised the issue, rather than all covered employees. more

Employer offered acceptable alternative job: FWC

The FWC has ruled that a Civmec electrical engineer who rejected an alternative role has no entitlement to a redundancy payment, finding the employer adequately explained its offer despite its "clumsy and at times misguided" approach. more

Unions pursuing "Lattouf clause" in ABC bargaining

In the wake of the ABC's unlawful sacking of journalist Antoinette Lattouf, union members at the national broadcaster are demanding that a new enterprise agreement enshrine workers' rights to report on subjects regardless of their political opinions or cultural backgrounds. more

CFMEU-brokered deal cemented despite eligibility gap

The FWC has approved a CFMEU-brokered enterprise agreement despite finding the union had no eligibility to represent the industrial interests of workers covered by the deal and no authority to negotiate it. more