Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber

Consultant facing costs of forcing HR services company to defend restraint bid

A senior consultant with a HR services company is facing a costs bill of thousands of dollars, after the Federal Magistrates Court found she acted unreasonably when she persisted in seeking interlocutory orders to restrain a law firm from defending her former employer against her adverse action claim.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
GM claims sacking revenge for marital breakdown WFH remaining at near-pandemic levels: Report 35% undervaluation rise under consent proposal FWC member rebuffs another recusal bid Key roles floated for FWO, FWC in construction blueprint
Court and tribunal decisions
FWC member rebuffs another recusal bid AI hallucinations insufficient for costs security order Swearing, bikini-pic-sharing wharfie subbed back in Union getting house in order after permit fail Union forces FWC to add labour supplier to SJSP order
Bullying
Swearing, bikini-pic-sharing wharfie subbed back in "Reckless" car chase justifies sacking: FWC "Bullied" worker put colleagues through "ordeal": FWC Shock performance review not bullying: FWC Bullying of transgender worker not made out: FWC