Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber

No comfort in High Court judges' questions, says NSW barrister; and the Federal Magistrates Court's role under Work Choices

A barrister on the NSW Government's legal team during the States/union High Court IR challenge has acknowledged that the judges' questions from the bench during the case were unlikely to change the views of commentators who believed a Court majority would decide in the Commonwealth's favour.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
BHP's SJSP orders would subvert scheme's purpose: Bench Bench rejects appeal against "absurd" teacher sacking Reinstatement for grieving worker seen at restaurant SDA calls for action on retail workloads, staffing Union not liable for delegate's "dead dog" comment: Court
Court and tribunal decisions
BHP's SJSP orders would subvert scheme's purpose: Bench Bench rejects appeal against "absurd" teacher sacking Reinstatement for grieving worker seen at restaurant Union not liable for delegate's "dead dog" comment: Court LSL body seeking "consistency" in High Court challenge
Bullying
Bullying of transgender worker not made out: FWC Departmental move a transfer, not a dismissal: FWC Parliament broadens NSW IRC's remit No continued bullying risk after contract terminated: FWC Commissioner rejects race bias claims