Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber

Intervention required on permitted matters: lawyers

Parliament should legislate to resolve the tension between what the FW Act's explanatory memorandum says on permitted content in bargaining and Fair Work Australia's ruling in the CEPU No. 1 case, according to barrister Robert Reitano and lawyer Emma Maiden.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Feedback affirms need to ban not void non-competes: Leigh Skilled challenges Federal Court bias ruling "Reckless" car chase justifies sacking: FWC Protected action freeze would "hinder" bargaining: FWC Four-day-week is coming: Top silk
Court and tribunal decisions
Skilled challenges Federal Court bias ruling "Reckless" car chase justifies sacking: FWC Protected action freeze would "hinder" bargaining: FWC FWC denies flex request due to lack of evidence FWC denies chance to challenge AI-driven retrenchment
Bullying
"Reckless" car chase justifies sacking: FWC "Bullied" worker put colleagues through "ordeal": FWC Shock performance review not bullying: FWC Bullying of transgender worker not made out: FWC Departmental move a transfer, not a dismissal: FWC