Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber

Fortescue's "intrusive" spying needed for search bid: Court

Fortescue's alleged excessive and intrusive surveillance of former employees it accuses of using its intellectual property in their start-up venture does not provide a basis for scrapping or varying search orders issued by a duty judge, a Federal Court judge has ruled today, while a judge in another case has reserved his decision on whether to keep evidence secret in an adverse action case brought by a Seven Network producer.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.