A tribunal has allowed a crime prevention officer to proceed with a claim that her employer discriminated against her when it asked whether she worked as a prostitute, while a court has awarded only "modest" damages to a woman it found had no ongoing medical or psychological conditions as a result of sexual harassment she had suffered.
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.
Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.
Go back to our homepage here.