Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber

No-win, no-fee lawyer experience leaves "sour taste"

The FWC has made tart observations about relying on no-win, no-fee lawyers and agents in refusing to extend time by seven months for a worker allegedly unfairly sacked for disclosing a medicinal cannabis prescription for pain relief.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
No-win, no-fee lawyer experience leaves "sour taste" Watchdog's "model" conduct not a factor in costs: Court Victorian teachers voting on strike action FWC slams door on seconds-late applications Compulsory generative-AI disclosure looming for FWC users
Court and tribunal decisions
No-win, no-fee lawyer experience leaves "sour taste" Watchdog's "model" conduct not a factor in costs: Court FWC slams door on seconds-late applications Federal Court suppresses another fair work case Contested multi-deal shows changes "here to stay": ASU
Bullying
No basis for rubber-duck prank sackings: FWC Anti-bullying workaround gives peace a chance PSA industrial officer not sacked over complaint: Court No false start for anti-bullying application ANMF leaders returned as rival union crashes