Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber
Casuals' "significant detriment" justifies axing deal: Bench
A FWC full bench has axed an 11-year-old deal that excluded minimum engagement periods for casuals, finding that it must terminate agreements if their continued operation would be unfair to "any" rather than all covered employees.
You need to be logged in to read this article.
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.
Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.
Go back to our homepage here.
Court and tribunal decisions