Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber

FWC lacks power to consider council's cross-bullying claims

The FWC has found that because an Adelaide council is not a constitutional corporation the tribunal cannot deal with cross anti-bullying orders sought by its acting chief executive and one of its elected councillors, but it says other councils might be trading corporations covered by its jurisdiction.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Work for multiple Uber entities counts in deactivation case Union seeks to put meat on bones of delegates' rights FWC member's "rich life" spans lycra and muscle cars SJSP bid aims to close $80,000 Gorgon pay gap Departmental move a transfer, not a dismissal: FWC
Court and tribunal decisions
Work for multiple Uber entities counts in deactivation case Departmental move a transfer, not a dismissal: FWC Unfairly dismissed overseas paralegal wins $11,000 payout FWC puts supported bargaining on McDonald's menu Bench makes first contested supported bargaining authorisation
Bullying
Departmental move a transfer, not a dismissal: FWC Parliament broadens NSW IRC's remit No continued bullying risk after contract terminated: FWC Commissioner rejects race bias claims "Bullied" worker failed to heed reasonable demands: FWC