Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber

FWC bench puts "shadow lawyers" on notice

In a decision that could redefine representation before the FWC, a full bench has found that a law firm's "substantial" preparation of Woolworths' defence in an unfair dismissal case required permission even though it didn't appear as the company's advocate.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Appeal court sinks teeth into "employee" definition New FWC member's "secret weapon" Work for multiple Uber entities counts in deactivation case Union seeks to put meat on bones of delegates' rights FWC member's "rich life" spans lycra and muscle cars
Court and tribunal decisions
Work for multiple Uber entities counts in deactivation case Departmental move a transfer, not a dismissal: FWC Unfairly dismissed overseas paralegal wins $11,000 payout FWC puts supported bargaining on McDonald's menu Bench makes first contested supported bargaining authorisation
Bullying
Departmental move a transfer, not a dismissal: FWC Parliament broadens NSW IRC's remit No continued bullying risk after contract terminated: FWC Commissioner rejects race bias claims "Bullied" worker failed to heed reasonable demands: FWC