Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber

Employer pays for "naive and unacceptable" interpretation of employment contract

A finance broking house that issued a Brisbane-based employee five payslips in six years and employed him on a commission-based agreement that it believed did not entitle him to base salary, sick pay, annual leave and superannuation entitlements has been ordered to pay him almost $124,000 in penalties.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Union seeks to put meat on bones of delegates' rights FWC member's "rich life" spans lycra and muscle cars SJSP bid aims to close $80,000 Gorgon pay gap AWU pulls Paraburdoo MSD but plans to resubmit IR barrister fined for "unwanted s-xual touching"
Court and tribunal decisions
Unfairly dismissed overseas paralegal wins $11,000 payout FWC puts supported bargaining on McDonald's menu Bench makes first contested supported bargaining authorisation "Brutal" humiliation of worker did not warrant sacking: Bench Bus drivers claw back deductions for work bans
Bullying
Parliament broadens NSW IRC's remit No continued bullying risk after contract terminated: FWC Commissioner rejects race bias claims "Bullied" worker failed to heed reasonable demands: FWC FWC directs employer to review bullying finding