Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber

Employer fined for breaching "important" job security clause

The ETU says a $40,000 penalty against an employer for failing to consult before engaging labour hire workers on inferior pay and conditions sends a message that pre-Building Code job security clauses in agreements are still enforceable.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Work for multiple Uber entities counts in deactivation case Union seeks to put meat on bones of delegates' rights FWC member's "rich life" spans lycra and muscle cars SJSP bid aims to close $80,000 Gorgon pay gap AWU pulls Paraburdoo MSD but plans to resubmit
Court and tribunal decisions
Work for multiple Uber entities counts in deactivation case Unfairly dismissed overseas paralegal wins $11,000 payout FWC puts supported bargaining on McDonald's menu Bench makes first contested supported bargaining authorisation "Brutal" humiliation of worker did not warrant sacking: Bench
Bullying
Parliament broadens NSW IRC's remit No continued bullying risk after contract terminated: FWC Commissioner rejects race bias claims "Bullied" worker failed to heed reasonable demands: FWC FWC directs employer to review bullying finding