Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber

Employer "disingenuous" in reprising PABO objections

The FWC has found two types of proposed industrial action against an employer unlawful because they lack specificity, but has also labelled the company "disingenuous" for objecting to the original PABO, withdrawing its concerns and then re-ventilating them a month later.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Work for multiple Uber entities counts in deactivation case Union seeks to put meat on bones of delegates' rights FWC member's "rich life" spans lycra and muscle cars SJSP bid aims to close $80,000 Gorgon pay gap AWU pulls Paraburdoo MSD but plans to resubmit
Court and tribunal decisions
Work for multiple Uber entities counts in deactivation case Unfairly dismissed overseas paralegal wins $11,000 payout FWC puts supported bargaining on McDonald's menu Bench makes first contested supported bargaining authorisation "Brutal" humiliation of worker did not warrant sacking: Bench
Bullying
Parliament broadens NSW IRC's remit No continued bullying risk after contract terminated: FWC Commissioner rejects race bias claims "Bullied" worker failed to heed reasonable demands: FWC FWC directs employer to review bullying finding