Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber

Court tosses out "warring" brothers' adverse action case

A judge has rejected a business owner's claim of unlawful sacking because he repeatedly accused his co-owner brother of bullying and conflicts of interest, finding their "poisonous" relationship unrelated to his dismissal for ignoring a direction to stay away from the office while under investigation for allegedly harassing employees.

You need to be logged in to read this article.

Subscribers log in here

Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.

Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.

Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.

Go back to our homepage here.

Latest news
Work for multiple Uber entities counts in deactivation case Union seeks to put meat on bones of delegates' rights FWC member's "rich life" spans lycra and muscle cars SJSP bid aims to close $80,000 Gorgon pay gap AWU pulls Paraburdoo MSD but plans to resubmit
Court and tribunal decisions
Work for multiple Uber entities counts in deactivation case Unfairly dismissed overseas paralegal wins $11,000 payout FWC puts supported bargaining on McDonald's menu Bench makes first contested supported bargaining authorisation "Brutal" humiliation of worker did not warrant sacking: Bench
Bullying
Parliament broadens NSW IRC's remit No continued bullying risk after contract terminated: FWC Commissioner rejects race bias claims "Bullied" worker failed to heed reasonable demands: FWC FWC directs employer to review bullying finding