A director's argument that he is well qualified to represent his company in an underpayments case has fallen flat, a court citing a "lack of objectivity" as being among the reasons to reject the proposition.
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.
Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.
Go back to our homepage here.