Login or become a Workplace Express subscriber
Barrister's history of representing unions would not lead to bias
A barrister's history of representing unions did not mean there could be a reasonable apprehension that he would be biased in arbitrating an industrial dispute between a demolition company and Victoria's Bracks Government, the State's Supreme Court has held.
You need to be logged in to read this article.
Having trouble using your subscription? Contact us for help or check our FAQ page here for answers to commonly asked questions.
Non subscribers: Access Workplace Express by starting your subscription here.
Haven't seen Workplace Express before? For a 28-day free trial sign up here.
Go back to our homepage here.